Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Engages with the post-Darwinian biology central to Deleuze and Guattari’s ecological thought Finds a strong convergence in Deleuze and Guattari’s work with new directions in evolutionary theory Thinking about the symbiosis between philosophy and science in new ways Summarises, interprets and evaluates of Deleuze’s relationship to evolutionary theory, from Darwin through Ruyer Resists a straightforward characterisation of Deleuze as a critic of evolution, instead looking at his debt to – and his inheritance, reconfiguration and anticipation of – a number of tendencies integral to evolutionary thought, both in its historical and emerging dimensions Deleuze and Evolutionary Theory gathers together contributions by many of the central theorists in Deleuze studies who have led the way in breaking down the boundaries between philosophical and biological research. They focus on the significance of Deleuze and Guattari’s engagements with evolutionary theory across the full range of their work, from the interpretation of Darwin in Difference and Repetition to the symbiotic alliances of wasp and orchid in A Thousand Plateaus . In this way, they explore the anthropological, social and biopolitical significance of the convergences and divergences between philosophy and evolutionary science. Contributors Barry Allen , McMaster University, Canada. Michael James Bennett , University of King’s College in Halifax, Canada. Claire Colebrook , Penn State University, USA Erin Hortle , University of Tasmania, USA. Paul-Antoine Miquel , University of Toulouse II – Jean Jaurès, France. Johan Normark , University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Tano S. Posteraro , Penn State University, USA. Jon Roffe , Deakin University and Melbourne School of Continental Philosophy, Australia. Daniel W. Smith , Purdue University, USA. Hannah Stark , University of Tasmania, Australia. "
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it