IMPACT OF POLARIMETRIC SAR SPECKLE REDUCTION ON CLASSIFICATION OF AGRICULTURE LANDS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Presence of speckle in the Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) images could decrease the performance of information extraction applications such as classification, segmentation, change detection, etc. Hence, an essential pre-processing step named de-speckling is needed to suppress this granular noise-like phenomenon from the PolSAR images. In this paper, a comparison study is conducted between several new PolSAR speckle reduction methods such as POSSC, PNGF, and ANLM. For this comparison, a 4-look L-band AIRSAR NASA/JPL PolSAR dataset that obtained over an agriculture land from Flevoland, Netherlands, was employed. The de-speckling assessment was completed based on some no-reference quantitative indicators. All the de-speckling methods were evaluated in terms of speckle reduction form homogeneous areas, details, and radiometric preservation, and retaining the polarimetric information. Furthermore, the impact of PolSAR de-speckling on classification was evaluated. For this purpose, Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was used to classify H/A/Alpha decomposition. Experimental results showed that the ANLM method was better to suppress the speckle, followed by the PNGF method. Also, the classification results showed that a proper PolSAR de-speckling could effectively increase the classification accuracy. The improvement of the Overall Accuracy based on de-speckling using the ANLM method was approximately 22% and 13% higher than the POSSC and PNGF methods, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".