Optimal ADMM-Based Spectrum and Power Allocation for Heterogeneous Small-Cell Networks with Hybrid Energy Supplies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Powering cellular networks with hybrid energy supplies is not only environment-friendly but can also reduce the on-grid energy consumption, thus being emerging as a promising solution for green networking. Intelligent management of spectrum and power can increase the network utility in cellular networks with hybrid energy supplies, usually at the cost of higher energy consumption. Unlike prior studies on either the network utility maximization or on-grid energy cost minimization, this paper studies the joint spectrum and power allocation problem that maximizes the system revenue in a heterogeneous small-cell network with hybrid energy supplies. Specifically, the system revenue is considered as the difference between the network utility and on-grid energy cost. By developing the convexity of the optimization problem through transformation and reparameterization, we propose a joint spectrum and power allocation algorithm based on the primal-dual arguments to obtain the optimal solution by iteratively solving the primal and dual sub-problems of the convex optimization problem. To solve the primal sub-problem, we further propose the Lagrangian maximization based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), and derive the optimal solution in the closed-form expression at each iteration. It is shown that the proposed joint spectrum and power allocation algorithm approaches the global optimality at the rate of 1=n with n being the number of iterations. Also, the proposed ADMM-based Lagrangian maximization algorithm approaches the primal optimal solution with the time complexity of O(1=ε <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">r</sub> ) iterations with ε <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">r</sub> being the termination parameter. Simulation results show that in comparison with the power control with equal frequency allocation algorithm and frequency allocation with equal power allocation algorithms the proposed algorithm increases the system revenue by over 20 and 60 percent without consuming more on-grid energy when the proportional fairness utility and the weighted sum rate utility are considered with the approximate system parameter settings, respectively. Meanwhile, in comparison with the full frequency reuse case, the proposed algorithm increases the system revenue by 20 percent at least in terms of the weighted sum rate utility, although it achieves the similar system revenue when considering the proportional fairness utility. Simulation results also show that our proposed algorithm can perform well under the realistic fast fading channel conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it