Accurate Parameter Estimation of a Hydro-Turbine Regulation System Using Adaptive Fuzzy Particle Swarm Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parameter estimation is an important part in the modeling of a hydro-turbine regulation system (HTRS), and the results determine the final accuracy of a model. A hydro-turbine is normally a non-minimum phase system with strong nonlinearity and time-varying parameters. For the parameter estimation of such a nonlinear system, heuristic algorithms are more advantageous than traditional mathematical methods. However, most heuristics based algorithms and their improved versions are not adaptive, which means that the appropriate parameters of an algorithm need to be manually found to keep the algorithm performing optimally in solving similar problems. To solve this problem, an adaptive fuzzy particle swarm optimization (AFPSO) algorithm that dynamically tunes the parameters according to model error is proposed and applied to the parameter estimation of the HTRS. The simulation studies show that the proposed AFPSO contributes to lower model error and higher identification accuracy compared with some traditional heuristic algorithms. Importantly, it avoids a possible deterioration in the performance of an algorithm caused by inappropriate parameter selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".