MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981207840 · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmz061

Corrigendum: Conducting ethnography in primary care

2019· erratum· en· W2981207840 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fiona Webster, Kathleen Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueFamily Practice · 2019
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicinePrimary carePrimary health careEthnographyFamily medicineEnvironmental healthAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Family Practice 2019; 36(4): 523–525. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmz007 This paper has been amended to correct an error on p.523 The following line was corrected from ‘highly appropriate' to ‘highly inappropriate': “In most circumstances, however, it would be highly appropriate for the researcher to participate in this dialogue.” The author apologies for this oversight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.125
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.125
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0130.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueFamily PracticeSame topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207