MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981224308 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935369

Discovery of a nitrogen-enhanced mildly metal-poor binary system: Possible evidence for pollution from an extinct AGB star

2019· article· en· W2981224308 on OpenAlexfundno aff
José G. Fernández-Trincado, R. E. Mennickent, M. Cabezas, O. Zamora, Sarah L. Martell, Timothy C. Beers, Vinicius M. Placco, David M. Nataf, Szabolcs Mészáros, D. Minniti, D. R. G. Schleicher, Baitian Tang, Ángeles Pérez-Villegas, A. C. Robin, C. Reylé

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoLeibniz-GemeinschaftSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikUniversité de Franche-ComtéNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieAkademie Věd České RepublikyUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityCarnegie Institution for ScienceSun Yat-sen UniversityJoint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the ElementsCarnegie Mellon UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityNational Science FoundationNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeYale University
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsGlobular clusterStarsAbundance of the chemical elementsRadial velocityGiant starBinary numberHaloAbundance (ecology)GalaxyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the serendipitous discovery of a nitrogen-rich, mildly metal-poor ([Fe/H] = −1.08) giant star in a single-lined spectroscopic binary system found in the SDSS-IV Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE-2) survey, Data Release 14 (DR14). Previous work has assumed that two percent of halo giants with unusual elemental abundances have been evaporated from globular clusters, but other origins for their abundance signatures, including binary mass transfer, must also be explored. We present the results of an abundance reanalysis of the APOGEE-2 high-resolution near-infrared spectrum of 2M12451043+1217401 with the Brussels Automatic Stellar Parameter (BACCHUS) automated spectral analysis code. We manually re-derive the main element families, namely light elements (C, N), elements (O, Mg, Si), the iron-peak element (Fe), s -process element (Ce), and light odd-Z element (Al). Our analysis confirms the N-rich nature of 2M12451043+1217401, which has a [N/Fe] ratio of +0.69, and shows that the abundances of C and Al are slightly discrepant from those of a typical mildly metal-poor red giant branch star, but exhibit Mg, Si, O and s -process abundances (Ce) of typical field stars. We also detect a particularly large variability in the radial velocity of this star over the period of the APOGEE-2 observations; the most likely orbit fit to the radial velocity data has a period of 730.89 ± 106.86 days, a velocity semi-amplitude of 9.92 ± 0.14 km s −1 , and an eccentricity of ∼0.1276 ± 0.1174. These data support the hypothesis of a binary companion, which has probably been polluted by a now-extinct asymptotic giant branch star.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→