MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981251456 · doi:10.5382/sp.18.11

Muon Geotomography—Bringing New Physics to Orebody Imaging

2014· book-chapter· en· W2981251456 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsMowi (Canada)Geological Survey of CanadaTRIUMFUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralGeochemistryGeologyMineralogyEarth scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Muon geotomography, a novel geophysical exploration and imaging technology, uses cosmic rays to create three-dimensional (3-D) images of subsurface density distributions. The first controlled field test confirming the capability of muon geotomography for imaging a dense orebody in a complex geologic environment was conducted at the Price volcanic-hosted massive sulfide (VHMS) deposit, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. The semimassive and massive polymetallic mineralization of the Price deposit is situated in a Paleozoic stratigraphic package of rocks known as the Sicker Group including the Price, Myra, Thelwood, and Flower Ridge Formations, indicative of volcanic rocks formed in a rifted oceanic island-arc system. The field application involved placing a sensor with an active area of 1 m 2beneath the massive sulfide orebody in an underground tunnel for exposures of about two weeks at several locations. Muon flux data were inverted to recover a 3-D density image of the deposit. The inverted data were in good agreement with drill core data. However, some distortions of the image were observed due to the limitations imposed by the available tunnel which restricted the angular views available to the sensors. Muon geotomography works best when sensors are placed such that they can view the region under study from a range of different angles. The demonstrated ability to perform accurate forward model simulations makes the sensitivity of the technique predictable for specific survey situations. The results demonstrate the potential of muon geotomography for identification and characterization of orebodies located in complex geologic environments. Three-dimensional images from muon geotomography surveys may be used to guide drilling operations toward regions of high-density contrast, thereby significantly reducing costs and environmental impact associated with locating orebodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it