MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981283097 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-109473

Endothelium-Derived Microparticles: Functions and Clinical Relevance

2018· article· en· W2981283097 on OpenAlexaff
Jason E. Fish

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrovesiclesmicroRNABiomarkerDiseaseExtracellular vesicleBioinformaticsCellMedicineImmunologyExosomeBiologyGeneInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are receiving increased attention as circulating biomarkers of disease. Since they are produced by cells of the cardiovascular system, their contents (including lipids, proteins and microRNAs) can be measured to provide information about the relative health or dysfunction of the cardiovascular system. We recently demonstrated that healthy endothelium can package anti-inflammatory microRNAs into secreted EVs. The transfer of EV-encapsulated microRNAs can suppress monocyte activation through the targeting of genes encoding inflammatory signaling components in the recipient cell. The microRNA content of EVs therefore serve not only as a biomarker but can functionally contribute to cell-cell communication in the cardiovascular system to affect vascular health and disease. We have developed a methodology for high-throughput profiling of microRNAs in human plasma EV samples and will present data elucidating microRNA biomarkers in the setting of co-morbidities that elevate cardiovascular risk. In these settings, we are identifying predictive biomarkers of cardiovascular disease and are determining the functional importance of EVs to disease progression. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207