MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981289477 · doi:10.1039/9781788016155-00001

The Role of Hydrocolloids in the Development of Food Structure

2019· book-chapter· en· W2981289477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides Composition and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPectinFood scienceChemistryCarrageenanFood additiveSolubilityPolysaccharidePolymer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrocolloids are a class of food ingredients (mainly polysaccharides and some proteins) that are widely applied in various food products. Their role as thickeners, water retention agents, stabilizers, emulsifiers, gel-forming agents, and dietary fibers has been previously summarized in many review papers. In this chapter, the role of hydrocolloids in the development of food structure is the main focus. Three most relevant functions of hydrocolloids as food structure contributors, i.e. water solubility, viscosity, and gelation, as well as their structure–function origins in terms of molecular weight, branched structure, functional groups, and conformations, are all discussed. In addition, a few of these unique functionalities and applications are presented, e.g. sodium per calcium alginate, high-/low-methoxyl pectin, methyl cellulose, carrageenan, and gum arabic, as examples of the use of hydrocolloids in food structure development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it