MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981339072 · doi:10.4095/211781

The Neoproterozoic Windermere Supergroup: an on-land continental margin turbidite system, British Columbia and Alberta

2000· report· en· W2981339072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G M Ross

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupergroupTurbiditeGeologyContinental marginMargin (machine learning)PaleontologySedimentary rockTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Windermere Supergroup is a regionally widespread succession of predominantly deep marine sedimentary rocks deposited on the continental margin of western Canada following its separation from Australia ca. 700 Ma. A vertical succession from sand-rich basin plain turbidites ta mud-rich slope facies occurs over a ca. 7 km thick stratigraphie interval and records the progradation of the continental margin attendant with diminished rates of thermally-driven subsidence. Although unfossiliferous and deformed in the Mesozoic, careful stratigraphie mapping, utilizing a lithologically distinct condensed interval (SHEET 2) and two carbonate-rich lowstand intervals have established regional continuity of this depositional system over ca. 4° of latitude. The continuity of the depositional system has also been established using geochronology of detrital zircons which reveals a uniform provenance throughout the southeastern Canadian Cordillera (SHEET 2). Taken in concert with facies patterns and paleocurrent data, the Windermere grits are interpreted as a longitudinal turbidite system that flowed west

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207