De la logique institutionnelle à la connectivité performative : étude thématique des messages publiés sur les sites web du gouvernement fédéral canadien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche étudie la logique institutionnelle et la connectivité performative des messages officiels publiés par les institutions fédérales canadiennes (IFC) sur leurs sites web officiels, en adoptant une approche communicationnelle (CCO). Dans le contexte d’une politique numérique impulsée par le gouvernement Trudeau depuis 2015, qui tient compte de la présence des citoyens sur les plateformes socionumériques, cette recherche analyse la logique institutionnelle des IFC et la visibilité des individus et des collectivités humaines présentifiés dans les messages institutionnels. L’analyse thématique de publications institutionnelles sur le web montre que les IFC transmettent des messages qui constituent une logique dominée par la pensée traditionnelle et néo-institutionnelle. Elle désincarne les communications institutionnelles, qui ne parviennent pas à appliquer le principe de connectivité performative recherché par les directives fédérales des communications sur le web.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".