MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981362354 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0137

2350Evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of a ticagrelor reversal agent PB2452

2019· article· en· W2981362354 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa K. Jennings, Benjamin J. Curry, Deepak L. Bhatt, Charles V. Pollack, Jeffrey I. Weitz, Sherry L. Xu, J S Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTicagrelorMedicineP2Y12AspirinPharmacodynamicsPharmacologyAcute coronary syndromeAnesthesiaInternal medicineClopidogrelPharmacokineticsMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 antagonist used in combination with aspirin to reduce the risk of recurrent thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Ticagrelor is associated with a risk for spontaneous major bleeding or bleeding associated with invasive procedures, particularly cardiac surgery. A rapid-acting reversal agent for ticagrelor would be advantageous. The pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor and a ticagrelor reversal agent are best evaluated using a panel of platelet function tests that have different sensitivities and methodologies and using a variety of agonists at different concentrations. Purpose In a first-in-human randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, healthy volunteer Phase 1 study, intravenous (IV) PB2452, a monoclonal antibody fragment that binds ticagrelor with high affinity, was evaluated as a ticagrelor reversal agent. Methods Platelet function was assessed using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and 5 and 20 μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP), 1.6 mM arachidonic acid (AA), and 15 μM thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP-6) as agonists. The VerifyNow P2Y12 cartridges, which assess whole blood platelet function, were evaluated as a point-of-care test. A modified vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) ELISA was used to assess the extent of P2Y12 signaling. These assessments were performed 48 h prior to ticagrelor administration and at multiple time points up to 48 h after administration of PB2452 or placebo. Results 64 subjects were randomized; 48 received PB2452 and 16 received placebo. After ticagrelor administration, LTA response to 20 μM ADP was inhibited by 87% compared to the pre-ticagrelor values. Platelet function as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 cartridge was completely inhibited (<10 platelet reactivity units [PRU]). The VASP platelet reactivity index (PRI) was inhibited by 82%. Ticagrelor reduced TRAP-6 induced LTA by 30% reflecting the effect of ADP on platelet aggregate stability. PB2452 administered as a 10 min IV bolus followed by 16 h infusion, significantly restored platelet function to >80% and >90% of baseline as measured by LTA using ADP and TRAP-6, respectively, to >180 PRU using VerifyNow, and to >90% PRI as measured by VASP. The VASP assay enabled batch analyses in a central laboratory, eliminating the need for special equipment on-site and reducing operator variability. When platelet function was assessed by VASP, PB2452 administration produced rapid ticagrelor reversal within 5 min consistent with restoration of P2Y12 signaling. Onset of reversal by all measurements occurred within 15 min of PB2452 administration and was sustained for 20–24 h. Conclusions PB2452 is a specific reversal agent for ticagrelor and produces a rapid and sustained reversal of ticagrelor inhibition of platelets. Utilizing multiple platelet function assays provided a broader understanding of the PB2452 pharmacodynamics in this first-in-human Phase 1 study. Acknowledgement/Funding PhaseBio Pharmaceuticals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207