MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981368334 · doi:10.3390/app9204465

Rolling Bearing Incipient Fault Detection Based on a Multi-Resolution Singular Value Decomposition

2019· article· en· W2981368334 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jiesi Luo, Shaohui Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsImpulse (physics)AcousticsSIGNAL (programming language)Singular spectrum analysisSingular value decompositionComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The periodic impulse characteristics caused by rolling bearing damage are weak in the incipient failure stage. Thus, these characteristics are always drowned out by background noise and other harmonic interference. A novel approach based on multi-resolution singular value decomposition (MRSVD) is proposed in order to extract the periodic impulse characteristics for incipient fault detection. With the MRSVD method, the vibration signal is first decomposed to obtain a group of approximate signals and detailed signals with different resolutions. The first detail signal is mainly composed of noise and the last approximate signal is mainly composed of harmonic interference. Combined with the kurtosis index, the hidden periodic impulse signal will be extracted from the detail signals (in addition to the first detail signal). Thus, the incipient fault detection of a rolling bearing can be fulfilled according to the envelope demodulation spectrum of the extracted periodic impulse signal. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been demonstrated with both simulation and experimental analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207