<i>Publisher to the Decadents: Leonard Smithers in the Careers of Aubrey Beardsley, Wilde, Dowson</i>, by James G. Nelson
Bibliographic record
Abstract
been fruitfully informed by recent theoretical and sociological accounts of the eighteenth-century reader, as well as by other studies of individual readers.While I have registered some minor disappointments with these essays, they result from the inevitable limitations of the discrete essay format and of the book's brevity.This limitation is in itself valuable, in that it points to the need for scholarship focussed squarely on the print culture of eighteenth-century Scotland, as opposed to studies such as Robert Crawford's Devolving English Literature and Leith Davis's Acts of Union: Scotland and the Literary Negotiation of the British Nation, z7o7-183o, which have made us aware of Scottish contributions to the formation of British cultural institutions.It is to be hoped that Volume II: z7o7-18oo of the projected four-volume History of the Book in Scotla~nd will further address this gap.In the interim, this handsome, well-written collection and catalogue is admirable in what it does accomplish, in putting both the Scottish culture of the book, and Canadian contributions to the study of that culture, into the hands of readers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".