MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981386732 · doi:10.4095/226360

Seismic hazard analysis for Montreal

2004· report· en· W2981386732 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luc Chouinard, Philippe Rosset, Antonio Puente, Ricardo Adolfo Madriz, Denis Mitchell, J Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismologyHazardSeismic hazardEnvironmental scienceGeologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to describe on-going research on the seismic hazard analysis and vulnerability assessment for the Montreal Urban Community. The first part describes the overall work being performed in developing an inventory of critical lifelines and the estimation of their seismic vulnerability. The second part describes a procedure and the results for a seismic microzonation of site effects that combine both a field approach based on ground-ambient noise analysis and numerical modeling based on one-dimensional SHAKE computations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207