MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981407399 · doi:10.1063/5.0128752

Sequences of trees and higher-order renormalization group equations

2023· article· en· W2981407399 on OpenAlexafffund
William T. Dugan, Loïc Foissy, Karen Yeats

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsRenormalization groupMathematicsOrder (exchange)Group (periodic table)Group theoryMathematical physicsCombinatoricsApplied mathematicsPhysicsPure mathematicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We define a notion of higher-order renormalization group equations and investigate when a sequence of trees satisfies such an equation. In the strongest sense, the sequence of trees satisfies a kth-order renormalization group equation when applying any choice of Feynman rules results in a Green function satisfying a kth-order renormalization group equation, and we characterize all such sequences of trees. We also make some comments on sequences of trees, which require special choices of Feynman rules in order to satisfy a higher-order renormalization group equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207