MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981427896 · doi:10.4095/223022

The Bras d'Or Lakes, Nova Scotia: seafloor topography, backscatter strength, coastline classification, and sensitivity of coasts to sea-level rise

2006· report· en· W2981427896 on OpenAlexaffabout
R B Taylor, E Patton, D P Potter, George S. Parkes, S E Hayward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaSeafloor spreadingOceanographyGeologyBackscatter (email)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research was carried out in the Bras d'Or Lakes, Nova Scotia under the aegis of Project X-29 in NRCan's Geoscience for Ocean Management Program, with additional funding from the Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Program,. The goal was to provide the scientific information that would help resolve management problems arising from the expected impact of accelerated sea-level rise on the coasts of the Bras dOr Lakes. The specific objectives of the work were: Define the recent, present and future trends of water-level increase in the Bras dOr Lakes. Knowing the recent (last 5000 yr) trend would allow us to understand how rising water levels triggered changes to coastal environments in the lakes. Knowing the modern trend would help us to understand coastal changes over the past 100 years. Some idea of future water levels would be a prerequisite to assessing how the modern coasts will change. Map the modern coastal environments. Assess future impacts on the range of coastal environments, particularly those environments that we suspected to be most sensitive and hence vulnerable. Transfer of information on coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise to stakeholders in GIS formats suitable for their systems. The results of the work are summarized as follows: 1) The lakes were fresh until ca. 6,350 calendar years ago, when rising sea level crossed the -25 m sill and connected them with the ocean. The rate of sea-level rise at the start of inundation was 79 cm/century, and has declined throughout the past 6000 years. Coastal landforms such as spits, barrier beaches, and cuspate forelands were submerged when exposed to the high rate of relative sea-level rise. Submerged shores are visible on multibeam sonar imagery, mainly in the southern lakes, where sediment supplies were abundant. Submerged river networks occur in St. Patricks Channel and Denys Basin. 2) The trend of modern sea-level rise in the region is 36.7 cm/century. Assuming the median increase predicted by the International Panel on Climate Change (2001) (48 cm/century from 1990-2001) and assuming it is distributed equally around the globe, then sea level in the Bras dOr Lakes will increase by 75 cm over the period 1990-2100 AD. The rate of increase will be 60 cm/century by 2030 AD, 99 cm/century by 2080 AD, and 115 cm/century by 2100 AD. 3) Total shoreline length is 1272 km, or 14.4 % of the Nova Scotian coastline (8811 km). Shorelines are grouped into eleven classes: three types of rock shore, seven types of nonrock shore (unconsolidated), and artificial shores. Coastal barriers make up 12 % of the shoreline. 39 % of these barriers are building and established, 44 % are in the breakdown and collapse phase, 13 % are in transition, and 4 % are artificially constrained. 4) We group the shoreline types into three sensitivity classes, depending on the likelihood that changes will be triggered by sea-level rise. 18.8 % have high sensitivity, 73.9 % have moderate sensitivity, and 7.3 % have low sensitivity. The most sensitive shoreline types are unconsolidated cliffs, coastal barriers, and artificial shores. 5) Coastal barriers will continue to change in their natural cycles of growth and decay over the coming century, but at higher rates. There will be an increasing tendency for complete submergence of coastal barriers by 2030 AD, and a strong likelihood of submergence by 2045 AD. We predict accelerated unconsolidated cliff erosion and increasing effort and expense to maintain coastal defenses, particularly those on barrier beaches that would otherwise migrate or submerge. 6) The recommended response to these future changes is to allow them to take place with as little interference as possible, that is, to allow the coast to respond in a natural way as it did in the past. Having a natural coast will ultimately benefit the region more than having a coastline constrained by coastal protection structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207