MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981494350 · doi:10.4095/295611

DSIM3D: software to perform unconstrained 3D inversion of magnetic data

2015· report· en· W2981494350 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Pilkington, Z Bardossy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)Computer scienceSoftwareGeologyAlgorithmComputational scienceProgramming languageSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DSIM3D provides a rapid, unconstrained 3D inversion of gridded magnetic data. It is a Geosoft GX implementation of an inversion approach (Pilkington, 2009) that produces a 3D susceptibility distribution from observed magnetic anomaly data. The GX accepts gridded magnetic data as input and produces a subsurface 3D distribution of magnetic susceptibilities due to an equally spaced array of dipoles. Input parameters include the depth of the model, the distance from the observation plane to the model, the maximum allowable number of iterations, an RMS error limit to terminate iterations, options for grid preconditioning, the initial model susceptibilities, the data noise level, the ambient magnetic field, and the magnetization inclination and declination. The output is a Geosoft voxel model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207