MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981499802 · doi:10.37767/2591-3476(2018)06

Derechos previsionales y VIH

2018· article· es· W2981499802 on OpenAlexaff
Maximiliano Rafael Calderón, Paulina R. Chiacchiera Castro

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Derecho y Salud | Universidad Blas Pascal · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Immigration
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTribunalPersonaAntecedent (behavioral psychology)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PensionHumanitiesHuman rightsPolitical scienceEconomic JusticeSentenceLawPhilosophyMedicinePsychologyVirologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el trabajo se analiza la primera sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Córdoba vinculada con derechos previsionales de una persona que vive con el VIH (virus de inmunodeficiencia humana), cuya doctrina constituye un valioso antecedente en tanto que brinda una solución adecuada al caso, acorde con los estándares internacionales fijados por los organismos especializados en la temática.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Derecho y Salud | Universidad Blas PascalSame topicHuman Rights and ImmigrationFrench-language works237,207