Red Indian Line, airborne geophysics compilation (part I), central Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Natural Resources Canada funded the recompilation of airborne magnetic and electromagnetic geophysical data over the Red Indian Line area of central Newfoundland as part of the national Targeted Geoscience Initiative (TGI) to stimulate mineral exploration. The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (GNL) supplied detailed survey data from their assessment files and the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) contributed regional data plus their expertise for processing and compiling the data. The objective of this geophysical recompilation is to make available to the public previously unpublished private sector data from GNL and to present it in the context of the regional magnetic coverage. These private sector surveys were submitted to GNL to meet mining claim assessment requirements. Each magnetic data set has been re-processed and merged with the GSC regional coverage, whereas the electromagnetic (EM), magnetic vertical gradient and VLF-EM data have simply been copied from the original files. Six more blocks of data will be available to the general public as part II of this project in the spring of 2002. These new data will be released as a separate CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".