MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981507393 · doi:10.1109/itc31.2019.00010

Fluctuations Around the Mean-Field for a Large Scale Erlang Loss System Under the SQ(d) Load Balancing

2019· article· en· W2981507393 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErlang (programming language)ServerPoisson processErlang distributionLimit (mathematics)Poisson distributionDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceExponential distributionAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsTheoretical computer scienceMathematical analysisComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the fluctuations of the transient and stationary empirical distributions around the meanheld for a large scale multi-server Erlang Loss system that has N servers. Jobs arrive according to a Poisson process with rate Nλ and each incoming job is dispatched by a central job dispatcher to the server with the minimum occupancy among d randomly chosen servers with ties broken uniformly at random. Previous works have studied the mean-held limit of this model and characterized the asymptotic behavior of the system when N → ∞. In this paper, we focus on quantifying the resulting error when we approximate the transient and stationary behavior of the system when N is large by the mean-held of the system. We obtain functional central limit theorems (FCLTs) by studying the limit of a suitably scaled fluctuation process of the stochastic empirical process of the model with index N around the mean-held limit when N → ∞. We show that for both the transient and stationary regimes, the limiting process is characterized by an OrnsteinUhlenbeck (OU) process. We also show that the interchange of limits lim <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N→∞</sub> lim <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t→∞</sub> = lim <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">t→∞</sub> lim <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N→∞</sub> is valid under the CLT scaling. Finally, we exploit the FCLT to show that the gap between the exact average blocking probability of a job in the system with the number of servers N and the limiting average blocking probability which is a function of the hxed-point of the mean-held, is of the order o(N <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-</sup> <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1/2</sup> ) and thus establish the accuracy of the mean-held approximation for hnite N.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207