MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981510975 · doi:10.3366/hlps.2019.0212

Donald Trump's Punitive Politics and the Question of Palestine: A Gaze into his Psychological Makeup and Business Ethics

2019· article· en· W2981510975 on OpenAlex
Elia Zureik

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdmirationPoliticsPunitive damagesPalestinePerceptionPolitical scienceGazeLawPsychologySocial psychologySociologyAestheticsPsychoanalysisHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

So much of what Donald Trump says and does is linked to his self-perception and proclivity towards exaggerating his accomplishments, talents and skills. Psychologically oriented analysts find him lacking in the important dimension of ‘emotional intelligence’ and the ability to empathise with others. Right from the outset, this set off a clash and breakoff with prospects for dialogue with the Palestinians. The Arab World remains unwilling to effect any perceptible change in the American and Israeli positions due to its own political agenda that centers on regime self-preservation, confrontation with Iran and admiration for Donald Trump.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it