MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981512945 · doi:10.19062/2247-3173.2019.21.27

CONTROL LAW FOR AN AIRCRAFT SUPERSONIC AIR INLET WITH INTERNAL COMPRESSION

2019· article· en· W2981512945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandru-Nicolae Tudosie, Emanuel DUMITRU, Marius-Alin ASPRA

Bibliographic record

VenueSCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE AIR FORCE · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupersonic speedInletEnvelope (radar)EngineeringWork (physics)MechanicsEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with a supersonic air inlet Laval-type. Based on thermo-and gasdynamic phenomena, the authors have determined the possibilities of Laval-type intake starting process; the starting envelope of the intake was also defined and graphically depicted. Some operating regimes of the intake, correlated to engine's operation were studied and intake's adjusting possibilities were described, as intake's work-lines; these lines were depicted on intake's operational envelope and some control law(s) were determined with respect to the worklines. Possible control architecture may be emphasized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE AIR FORCESame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207