Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intermontane Eagle Plain Basin lies within the mountainous and deformed Northern Yukon Fold Complex geological province of the northern mainland of Canada. This Paleozoic-Mesozoic basin forms a petroleum province that is less deformed and less structurally elevated compared to surrounding mountain belts. The Eagle Plain Basin contains the Eagle Fold Belt which consists of bundles of en-échelon folds that have wavelengths of several to tens of kilometres. The folds developed during the Laramide Orogeny and form well-defined structural closures suitable for entrapment of hydrocarbons in the subsurface. Several assessment studies of petroleum potential have been completed for the Eagle Plain Basin. Recent work associated with the Geomapping for Energy and Minerals Program interpreted petroleum exploration play concepts not previously defined. Evaluations of new petroleum data indicated the need to re-assess the conventional oil and gas potential of the basin. In this study, a total of 21 conventional petroleum exploration plays are defined. Also, the potential for unconventional tight oil and gas, and shale oil and gas accumulations (not previously assessed) are included in the report. Given the fact that some conventional plays and all of the unconventional plays were not quantitatively analyzed because of insufficient data, the total petroleum resource indicated in this study is likely a conservative estimate, as there is evidence for hydrocarbon charge in these non-assessed plays. The probabilistic assessment of total oil and gas potential (discovered and undiscovered) for all Phanerozoic sedimentary strata in Eagle Plain and its environs is 52.2*106 m3 (329 MMBO) of oil and 96.7*109 m3 (3.4 Tcf) of gas (in-place mean volumes). Although there are sizeable discovered reserves (3.2*106 m3 (20 MMBO) of oil and 4.6*109 m3 (165 Bcf) of gas), undiscovered resource potential is significant, as exemplified by the prediction of 2 remaining undiscovered oil pools with mean in-place volumes greater than 4.0*106 m3 (25.2 MMBO) and 4 gas pool sizes greater than 2.0*109 m3 (71 Bcf).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".