Moda y distinción social. Reflexiones en torno a los sentidos atribuidos a la moda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La moda es un fenómeno social, históricamente situado. Sus definiciones han sido variadas. La misma hace referencia por un lado, a la industria de la indumentaria y de todos los objetos, empresas y mercados vinculados a ella, y por el otro, a un cambio social, que atraviesa diversos aspectos de la vida de los sujetos. Estos dos planos se articulan y superponen, no se puede pensar uno sin el otro. En cada contexto se producen distintos sentidos sobre la moda y ésta se constituye en un elemento de distinción y en una marcade pertenencia. Así es que pensamos a la moda como un signo que marca por un lado la diferencia y por otro la pertenencia de los sujetos a grupos sociales (etarios, de clase, ideológicos, etc.). En este sentido, es que interesa estudiar la relación entre el fenómeno de las tendencias y los sentidos que socialmente se construyen alrededor de ella, haciendo hincapié sobre todo en los contextos de producción, circulación, consumo y apropiación.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.057 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".