MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981518448 · doi:10.4095/287949

The tri-national (2007) Maritimes data: some important and interesting observations

2011· report· en· W2981518448 on OpenAlexaffabout
R G Garrett

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data for six elements, As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn, are investigated in soil samples collected by the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) in the Maritime provinces (NB, NS and PEI) in 2007. Samples were collected from several soil horizons and intervals, 0-5 cm, A, 0-30 cm, B and C, by GSC, Environment Canada, and provincial agency staff, and in collaboration with soil scientists from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. A variety of analytical methods were investigated, ranging form a water leach to a 'total' mutli-acid digestion and Instrumental Neutron Activation (INA) applied to different sieved size fractions, <2 mm, <250 µm and <63 µm . Attention is focused on the data obtained using the Aqua Regia variant (4:1 HCl-HNO3) of the US-EPA 3050B protocol applied to the <2 mm fraction, with elements being determined in the digests by ICP-OES and ICPMS. An inspection of the data by soil horizon reveals systematic patterns of element distribution. For Pb and Cd levels decrease with depth until the B horizon is reached, they then increase and then fall with depth to the C horizon. For As, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn levels increase with depth until the B horizon, where they drop, and than increase with depth to the C horizon. As a generalization, levels in the 0-5 cm interval and B horizons are similar, as are levels in the 0-30 cm interval and the C horizon. In general, observed levels in the 0-5 cm interval and B horizon are similar, and levels in the 0-30 cm interval are similar to the C horizon. The role of Fe and Organic carbon was investigated across the 0-5 cm, A, B and C horizons. It is shown that there are systematic variations with depth and that these major soil components exercise a control on trace element levels through their ability to sequester trace elements and bind them in mineral forms or with metallo-organic ligands. A variety of analytical protocols were applied to C horizon soils in an investigation of the amounts of elements that might be bioavailable, i.e. as estimates of bioaccessibility. These data show that bioaccessibility estimates using a water leach are 1.5 (Cd) to 3 (Pb) orders of magnitude than PBET estimates for gastric intake, and that PBET estimates are lower by a half to 1.5 orders of magnitude lower than the results of routine geochemical analyses employing aqua regia-like digestions. It is concluded that there are advantages to consistently sampling a single soil horizon or interval, and in the case of an interval, it should be as narrow as operationally feasible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207