MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981524131 · doi:10.4095/298894

Seismic attenuation in the Anahim Volcanic Belt and adjacent regions of British Columbia

2016· report· en· W2981524131 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amir Mansour Farahbod, J. F. Cassidy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyVolcanoAttenuationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study we investigated coda-wave attenuation (Qc) in the interior of British Columbia, with a focus on the Anahim Volcanic Belt (AVB) and specifically the Nazko Cone region using the single scattering approximation on records from short period and broadband stations of the regional Canadian National Seismic Network (CNSN) and POLARIS Network. Our dataset is comprised of 380 earthquakes recorded between 1999 and 2012 with magnitudes ranging from 1.6 to 3.9, depths from 0 to 36 km and epicentral distances of 15 to 100 km. This gives a total of 423 high signal to noise (S/N) traces (S/N?5.0) useful for Qc calculation (with a range of ellipse parameter, a2, of 30 to 110) across the region. Coda windows were selected to start at tc = 2tS (two times the travel time of the direct S wave), and were filtered at center frequencies of 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 Hz. Although the dataset is relatively small, with substantial uncertainties, a consistent pattern emerges. We find that in the interior of BC, the lowest Q0 values (e.g., Q0 of 39) are in the vicinity of Nazko Cone, near the 2007 earthquake swarm. This sequence of more than 1000 earthquakes occurred at depths of 25-31 km and was interpreted as a magma injection at the base of the crust. Further, we find that all stations within the AVB show lower Q0 values compared to other stations in the BC interior. Averaging all data in the AVB with a2 of 30-50 km (UBRB, MCMB1, SULB, THMB) yields a low average Q0 of 53, compared to an average Q0 of 67 at other stations in the BC interior, and an average Q0 of 70 for stations in the Cascadia subduction zone. Our results showing low Q0 throughout the AVB (and the lowest Q0 at Nazko Cone) provides additional support for the interpretation of magma injection into the lower crust during the Nazko earthquake sequence, fracturing of the crust, and high seismic attenuation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207