MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data-driven prediction models of multi-dimensional energy consumed in public buildings

2019· article· en· W2981526631 on OpenAlexaff
Umberto Berardi

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData miningComputer scienceCluster analysisSupport vector machineProcess (computing)Energy (signal processing)Energy consumptionPredictive modellingRegression analysisMachine learningEngineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Due to the intense pressure from energy shortage and environmental protection, an accurate prediction of building energy consumption is crucial for different energy conservation applications and policies. Besides simulation models and traditional statistical approaches, a data-driven modelling based on energy records provides new opportunities for predicting the building energy demand. This research is conducted based on the whole procedure of data mining with limited datasets, by making use of machine learning techniques and mathematical statistics. Especially, regarding the temporal and the architectural scales, models can be categorized into the short-term prediction, medium-term prediction and long-term prediction of classified energy consumptions, which also represent different modelling characteristics derived from mass data, limited data and poor data respectively. During the modelling process, the fuzzy C-means clustering and the interdisciplinary Lorenz curve were utilized to recognize different energy patterns. Afterwards, models of the nonlinear Support Vector Regression, the Grey model and the traditional polynomial regression were utilized respectively to output the predicted sequence. In summary, with datasets in current energy platforms, this paper presents a study of data-driven models based on energy records considering the nonlinear and uncertain features of different multi-dimensional models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207