MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981534787 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1010

1146. Antibiotic Use in Infants Predicts Asthma Rate in Children 1–4 years at Fine Geographic Scale

2019· article· en· W2981534787 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdullah Mamun, Hind Sbihi, Stuart E. Turvey, Darlene Dai, Caren Rose, Drona Rasali, Fawziah Marra, David M. Patrick

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaPoisson regressionPopulationMedical prescriptionPediatricsIncidence (geometry)Rate ratioDemographyEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Early-life exposure to antibiotics is associated with childhood asthma. We previously reported that a dramatic drop in infant antibiotic use is correlated with a decline in asthma incidence in children in British Columbia (BC). This study aims to see whether antibiotic exposure predicts asthma at a fine geographic scale after adjustment for known covariates. Methods We used prescribing data from BC PharmaNet, a population-based database capturing all outpatient prescribing for BC population (n = 4.7 million). Prescribing rates for infants <1 year were calculated as prescriptions per 1000 population per year using age and sex-specified denominator estimates. Age-adjusted aggregate asthma incidence data for children 1–4 years were obtained from the BC Ministry of Health Chronic Disease Registry. The disease identification uses a standard case definition making using of diagnostic codes (ICD9-493 and ICD10-J45) in BC’s universal hospital and physician billing databases and relevant asthma-specific drug data from BC PharmaNet. We modeled the association between antibiotic prescribing rate and asthma incidence in 91 Local Health Areas using multivariable Poisson regression employing a generalized linear mixed-effects model adjusting for covariates. Results Between 2000 and 2014, the annual asthma incidence (ages 1–4 years) fell 26% from 27.3 (95% CI: 26.5–28.0) to 20.2 (95% CI: 19.5–20.8) per 1000 population. For children aged 1–4 years in 2000, the average proportion of infants exposed to one or more courses of antibiotics fell from 66.9 to 32.1% over the same interval. Antibiotic was a significant predictor of asthma rate (IRR=1.24 per 10% absolute increase in antibiotic prescribing; 95% CI: 1.19–1.27). Other covariates that remained significant in the model included male sex (IRR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.53–1.58), and atmospheric particulate matter PM 2.5 (IRR=1.08 per interquartile increase; 95% CI: 1.06–1.10). Conclusion Our findings suggest that antibiotic exposure in the first year of life increases the risk of being diagnosed with asthma later in childhood. This is congruent with similar findings at the individual level in a prospective cohort of Canadian children that also points to a pathway through altered gut microbiota. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207