MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981543718 · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b16326

Interface Properties of the Partially Oxidized Pt(111) Surface Using Hybrid DFT–Solvation Models

2019· article· en· W2981543718 on OpenAlexafffund
Víctor M. Fernández-Alvarez, Michael Eikerling

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceSolvationInterface (matter)Surface (topology)Chemical physicsNanotechnologyMoleculeComposite materialOrganic chemistryWetting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reports a theoretical-computational effort to model the interface between an oxidized platinum surface and aqueous electrolyte. It strives to account for the impact of the electrode potential, formation of surface-bound oxygen species, orientational ordering of near-surface solvent molecules, and metal surface charging on the potential profile along the normal direction. The computational scheme is based on the DFT/ESM-RISM method to simulate the charged Pt(111) surface with varying number of oxygen adatoms in acidic solution. This hybrid solvation method is known to qualitatively reproduce bulk metal properties like the work function. However, the presented calculations reveal that vital interface properties such as the electrostatic potential at the outer Helmholtz plane are highly sensitive to the position of the metal surface slab relative to the DFT-RISM boundary region. Shifting the relative position of the slab also affects the free energy of the system. It follows that there is an optimal distance for the first solvent layer within the ESM-RISM framework, which could be found by optimizing the position of the frozen Pt(111) slab. As it stands, manual sampling of the position of the slab is impractical and betrays the self-consistency of the method. Based on this understanding, we propose the implementation of a free energy optimization scheme of the relative position of the slab in the DFT-RISM boundary region. This optimization scheme could considerably increase the applicability of the hybrid method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207