MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981551689 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1094

1231. Legionella Variability From Routine Environmental Testing Across All Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical Facilities

2019· article· en· W2981551689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chetan Jinadatha, John David Coppin, Shantini D. Gamage, Stephen M. Kralovic, Gary A. Roselle

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLegionella and Acanthamoeba research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegionellaMedicineQuarter (Canadian coin)Logistic regressionOddsEnvironmental healthDemographyStatisticsOdds ratioGeographyMathematicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background VHA Legionella prevention policy requires quarterly testing of potable water samples, for its 170 medical facilities (“stations”) distributed across the United States. We modeled the variability in Legionella positivity rates by location structure and by time to understand Legionella prevalence and distribution across VHA nationwide. Our goal was to understand when, where and why variations in Legionella positivity happens across VHA facilities. Methods Data from quarterly water samples from sinks and showers from 2015 through 2017 and for which complete information was reported were used for the model. A multi-level Bayesian logistic regression model was run in R version 3.5.1. The hierarchical location group levels consisted of room nested within floor, within building, within station, within region. The time group-level effects included quarter nested within year. Variabilities within groups were estimated as standard deviation (SD) on the log-odds scale. Results Among 138,553 samples, there was little seasonal effect (SD: 0.32) in Legionella positivity based on the quarter in which they were sampled. The largest variability in Legionella positivity occurred at the station level (SD: 2.38), with substantial variation at the building level also (SD: 1.85). The 5% of stations most likely to be positive for Legionella represented only 7.5% of total samples but accounted for 39.7% of all positive samples. The 5% of stations least likely to be positive for Legionella represented 10.4% of total samples, but only had 2 positive samples. Conclusion Buildings with the highest probability for Legionella positivity are clustered together within stations. We saw no major seasonal variations in Legionella positivity across facilities. We were able to better predict stations with higher positivity as well as lower overall positivity for Legionella water sampling. The observed dominant station-level effects could be due to overarching influences such as a single water source and suggests approaches at this level can impact Legionella control. These results demonstrate a mechanism for understanding the distribution and probability of Legionella and can inform prevention practices and future policy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicLegionella and Acanthamoeba researchFrench-language works237,207