Enhanced Sensitivity of Dopamine Biosensors: An Electrochemical Approach Based on Nanocomposite Electrodes Comprising Polyaniline, Nitrogen-Doped Graphene, and DNA-Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new, highly-exfoliated nitrogen-doped graphene is electrochemically synthesized, which enhances the catalytic activity of poly(anilineboronic acid) nanocomposite electrodes for dopamine detection in the presence of excess ascorbic acid. The sensing approach is made up of poly(anilineboronic acid) nanocomposites electrodeposited on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode via in-situ electrochemical polymerization of anilineboronic acid monomers using cyclic voltammetry. A thin layer of DNA-functionalized carbon nanotubes, and nitrogen-doped graphene is coated on the electrode surface prior to electro-polymerization. During the electro-polymerization the π-π stacking and electrostatic interactions between DNA-coated carbon nanostructures and monomers anchors anilineboronic acid monomers on the electrode surface. This molecular anchoring increases electrodeposition of the respective nanocomposites on electrode; thus, greatly enhances the density of boronic acid receptors for dopamine binding. The coordinate covalent bonds between nitrogen atoms of graphene and boron atoms of anilineboronic acid monomers further increase the density of boronic acid groups for target analyte detection. The developed highly-sensitive and highly-selective biosensor is capable of dopamine detection in a wide linear range from 0.02-1μM, along with a detection limit of 14nM, which is a very significant step forward for dopamine detection and paves the way for molecular diagnosis of neurological illnesses such as Parkinson's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".