MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981554314 · doi:10.19086/aic.10256

The Structure of Binary Matroids with no Induced Claw or Fano Plane Restriction

2019· article· en· W2981554314 on OpenAlexaff
Peter S. Nelson, Luke Postle, Tom Kelly, František Kardoš, Marthe Bonamy

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Combinatorics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatroidCombinatoricsMathematicsGraphic matroidConjectureDiscrete mathematicsBinary treeVector spaceNatural numberInteger (computer science)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A well-known conjecture of András Gyárfás and David Sumner states that for every positive integer m and every finite tree T there exists k such that all graphs that do not contain the clique Km or an induced copy of T have chromatic number at most k. The conjecture has been proved in many special cases, but the general case has been open for several decades. The main purpose of this paper is to consider a natural analogue of the conjecture for matroids, where it turns out, interestingly, to be false. Matroids are structures that result from abstracting the notion of independent sets in vector spaces: that is, a matroid is a set M together with a nonempty hereditary collection I of subsets deemed to be independent where all maximal independent subsets of every set are equicardinal. They can also be regarded as generalizations of graphs, since if G is any graph and I is the collection of all acyclic subsets of E(G), then the pair (E(G),I) is a matroid. In fact, it is a binary matroid, which means that it can be represented as a subset of a vector space over F2. To do this, we take the space of all formal sums of vertices and represent the edge vw by the sum v+w. A set of edges is easily seen to be acyclic if and only if the corresponding set of sums is linearly independent. There is a natural analogue of an induced subgraph for matroids: an induced restriction of a matroid M is a subset M′ of M with the property that adding any element of M−M′ to M′ produces a matroid with a larger independent set than M′. The natural analogue of a tree with m edges is the matroid Im, where one takes a set of size m and takes all its subsets to be independent. (Note, however, that unlike with graph-theoretic trees there is just one such matroid up to isomorphism for each m.) Every graph can be obtained by deleting edges from a complete graph. Analogously, every binary matroid can be obtained by deleting elements from a finite binary projective geometry, that is, the set of all one-dimensional subspaces in a finite-dimensional vector space over F2. Finally, the analogue of the chromatic number for binary matroids is a quantity known as the critical number introduced by Crapo and Rota, which in the case of a graph G turns out to be ⌈log2(χ(G))⌉ -- that is, roughly the logarithm of its chromatic number. One of the results of the paper is that a binary matroid can fail to contain I3 or the Fano plane F7 (which is the simplest projective geometry) as an induced restriction, but also have arbitrarily large critical number. By contrast, the critical number is at most two if one also excludes the matroid associated with K5 as an induced restriction. The main result of the paper is a structural description of all simple binary matroids that have neither I3 nor F7 as an induced restriction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in CombinatoricsSame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207