Graph Sequence Recurrent Neural Network for Vision-Based Freezing of Gait Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FoG) is one of the most common symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), a neurodegenerative disorder which impacts millions of people around the world. Accurate assessment of FoG is critical for the management of PD and to evaluate the efficacy of treatments. Currently, the assessment of FoG requires well-trained experts to perform time-consuming annotations via vision-based observations. Thus, automatic FoG detection algorithms are needed. In this study, we formulate vision-based FoG detection, as a fine-grained graph sequence modelling task, by representing the anatomic joints in each temporal segment with a directed graph, since FoG events can be observed through the motion patterns of joints. A novel deep learning method is proposed, namely graph sequence recurrent neural network (GS-RNN), to characterize the FoG patterns by devising graph recurrent cells, which take graph sequences of dynamic structures as inputs. For the cases of which prior edge annotations are not available, a data-driven based adjacency estimation method is further proposed. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies on vision-based FoG detection using deep neural networks designed for graph sequences of dynamic structures. Experimental results on more than 150 videos collected from 45 patients demonstrated promising performance of the proposed GS-RNN for FoG detection with an AUC value of 0.90.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".