An <i>in silico</i> Approach for Integrating Phenotypic and Target‐based Approaches in Drug Discovery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phenotypic and target-based approaches are useful methods in drug discovery. The phenotypic approach is an experimental approach for evaluating the phenotypic response. The target-based approach is a rational approach for screening drug candidates targeting a biomolecule that causes diseases. These approaches are widely used for drug discovery. However, two serious problems of target deconvolution and polypharmacology are encountered in these conventional experimental approaches. To overcome these two problems, we developed a new in silico method using a probabilistic framework. This method integrates both the phenotypic and target-based approaches to estimate a relevant network from compound to phenotype. Our method can computationally execute target deconvolution considering polypharmacology and can provide keys for understanding the pathway and mechanism from compound to phenotype, thereby promoting drug discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it