MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Fresh Air Wristband: A wearable air pollutant monitor

2019· article· en· W2981606371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lin E, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Epidemiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolydimethylsiloxaneEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionExposure assessmentThermal desorptionPollutantTenaxEnvironmental chemistryMaterials scienceChromatographyGas chromatographyChemistryDesorptionComposite materialAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S14: Use of Exposomic Methods Incorporating Sensors in Environmental Epidemiology, Room 217, Floor 2, August 27, 2019, 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM Background: Evaluation of cumulative exposure to air pollutant mixtures has been challenged by traditional measurement techniques. Wearable passive air pollutant monitors have emerged as a tool for assessing personal exposure to environmental chemicals. These monitors concentrate airborne pollutants onto a substrate which can subsequently be analysed off-line for a broad range of compounds using mass spectrometry (MS). Longitudinal exposure assessment in vulnerable populations is facilitated by the lightweight, wearable form factor of these monitors. The low cost of this sampling technique further enables deployment across large populations, increasing the quantity of environmental data available for evaluating environmental risk factors for disease. Methods: We have applied a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sorptive extraction technique to passively concentrate non-polar compounds from the air. Gas rods are coated with a thin PDMS film and then mounted into a silicone band (the Fresh Air Wristband). The wristband is worn by an individual for period of several hours to days depending on ambient levels. Sample analysis is performed using a gas chromatograph Orbitrap MS equipped with the thermal desorption unit. Using this technique, we can quantify time-integrated exposure to a range of semi-volatile organic compounds. We deployed the Fresh Air wristband in several large epidemiologic studies based in the U.S., Canada, South Africa and China. Results: The PDMS sorbent in the Fresh Air wristband exhibited linear uptake of chemicals across a range of exposure concentrations that are representative of ambient air levels (R^2>0.99). Low variation was observed across replicate samples exposure to airborne pollutants in field tests (%CV<10). Deployment of the wristband with children, pregnant women the elderly has enabled characterisation of unique exposure profiles. Conclusions: Capturing the cumulative exposure of an individual to mixtures of air pollutants using wearable passive samplers is a novel advancement towards identifying disease risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental EpidemiologySame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207