MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981606832 · doi:10.4095/224581

Rock petrophysical analysis of Upper Devonian Jean Marie gas reservoir rocks in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia and in the contiguous area in northwestern Alberta

2007· report· en· W2981606832 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alan P. Byrnes, Jack Wendte, D. Sargent

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianGeologyPetrophysicsArchaeologyGeochemistryGeomorphologyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a summary of the rock petrophysical analysis of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) from the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia and the contiguous area of northwestern Alberta. The database includes 198 one-inch (2.54 cm) diameter core plugs sampled from 18 cores in the July Lake area and 18 one-inch (2.54 cm) diameter core plugs sampled from 5 cores in northwestern Alberta. Overall, the analysis includes data obtained (number of samples shown in parentheses) for porosity (215), grain density (215), routine air permeability (216), in situ Klinkenberg permeability (216), pore volume compressibility (26), the Archie cementation exponent electrical property (71), effective gas permeability at critical water saturation (40), relative gas permeability at critical water saturation (40), critical brine saturation (67) and mercury intrusion drainage capillary pressure analysis (40). Key rock petrophysical data is also summarized for the two most significant reservoir facies at July Lake, the platy stromatoporoid-Renalcis reef facies and the detrital stromatoporoid-coral foreslope facies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→