LE PROCESSUS D’EXCLUSION / INCLUSION DES ENFANTS EN SITUATION DE HANDICAP À L’ÉCOLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le paradigme inclusif promeut une manière qualitative d’inclure les enfants en situation de handicap à l’école et le rôle de l’environnement scolaire devient déterminant. Des acteurs scolaires et non scolaires, dans une situation d’inclusion, peuvent choisir de travailler ensemble et de mettre en œuvre un processus d’exclusion provisoire du milieu scolaire ordinaire en retravaillant collectivement la norme inclusive. Ce processus « d’exclusion / inclusion » relève d’un processus subversif, négocié et créateur. L’interactionnisme symbolique, l’analyse pluridisciplinaire des situations de travail et la clinique de l’activité sont mobilisés pour analyser ce processus. Cette recherche qualitative prend appui sur des observations, des entretiens, et une collecte de documents institutionnels et professionnels, réalisés au cours d’une démarche d’enquête socioanthropologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".