Bibliothèques publiques et virage citoyen : enjeux institutionnels et communicationnels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur les enjeux communicationnels et institutionnels inhérents aux transformations de la bibliothèque publique et sur les dynamiques institution-usagers à partir de l’étude empirique de la bibliothèque Marc-Favreau à Montréal. L’analyse révèle une imbrication étroite de questionnements situés au carrefour de la nature des missions de l’institution et des relations avec les citoyens, entraînant des modalités discursives, communicationnelles et pratiques plurielles, tant accomplies qu’en friche. L’éclairage de ce déploiement communicationnel, dans ses constituantes aussi bien convergentes que dissociées, constitue l’amorce d’une mise en perspective qui interroge la notion de bibliothèque citoyenne ainsi que les liens avec l’idée de tiers lieu et les logiques de démocratisation et de démocratie culturelles, de même que l’univers conceptuel de la citoyenneté culturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.023 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".