MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981627550 · doi:10.1088/1361-6544/abb5de

Asymptotics for the second-largest Lyapunov exponent for some Perron–Frobenius operator cocycles

2021· preprint· en· W2981627550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsLyapunov exponentLambdaBounded functionUpper and lower boundsBanach spaceTransfer operatorDynamical systems theoryExponentPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisChaotic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Given a discrete-time random dynamical system represented by a cocycle of non-singular measurable maps, we may obtain information on dynamical quantities by studying the cocycle of Perron–Frobenius operators associated to the maps. Of particular interest is the second-largest Lyapunov exponent for the cocycle of operators, λ 2 , which can tell us about mixing rates and decay of correlations in the system. We prove a generalized Perron–Frobenius theorem for cocycles of bounded linear operators on Banach spaces that preserve and occasionally contract a cone; this theorem shows that the top Oseledets space for the cocycle is one-dimensional, and there is a lower bound for the gap between the largest Lyapunov exponents λ 1 and λ 2 (that is, an upper bound for λ 2 which is strictly less than λ 1 ) explicitly in terms of quantities related to cone contraction. We then apply this theorem to the case of cocycles of Perron–Frobenius operators arising from a parametrized family of maps to obtain an upper bound on λ 2 ; to the best of our knowledge, this work is the first time λ 2 has been upper-bounded for a family of maps. In doing so, we utilize a new balanced Lasota–Yorke inequality. We also examine random perturbations of a fixed map within the family with two invariant densities and show that as the perturbation is scaled back down to the unperturbed map, λ 2 is at least asymptotically linear in the scale parameter. Our estimates are sharp, in the sense that there is a sequence of scaled perturbations of the fixed map that are all Markov, such that λ 2 is asymptotic to −2 times the scale parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it