Vivre-ensemble dans les régions du Québec : défis et enjeux contemporains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage reunit six communications presentees a l’occasion du seminaire intitule Vivre-ensemble dans les regions du Quebec : defis et enjeux contemporains organise par le Groupe de recherche et d’intervention regionales (GRIR) le 15 avril 2016 a l’Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi. Avec pour toile de fond le climat de crise des systemes economiques, l’emiettement des capacites des Etats et le triomphe de « l’hyperindividualisme » les contributions de cet ouvrage propose une reflexion construite a partir du fil conducteur de la realite multiforme du vivre-ensemble et des moyens de le favoriser. Cette reflexion commune aborde les enjeux et les defis que pose le vivre-ensemble au Quebec, en particulier au Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean comme partout en Occident. Les differentes contributions se donnent pour ambition de revisiter, de mieux elucider et d’actualiser les differentes dimensions du concept de vivre-ensemble et d’analyser ses multiples declinaisons au quotidien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".