MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981629808 · doi:10.14288/1.0383252

Resolving monazite growth mechanisms in orogenic gold settings : a study from the Klondike Gold District, Western Yukon

2019· article· en· W2981629808 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brodie A. Stroh

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMonaziteGeochemistryPhysical geographyEarth scienceGeographyZircon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orogenic gold deposits form some of the world's largest gold sources; however, the timing of gold mineralization is difficult to constrain. The ~20 Moz of placer gold mined in the Klondike was derived from orogenic, gold-bearing quartz veins where the exact timing of gold mineralization is unknown despite previous age data from hydrothermal micas and rutile. U-Th-Pb dating of hydrothermal monazite can be a robust alternative to constrain the timing of orogenic gold deposits and associated geological events that has not been attempted in the Klondike until now. In orogenic gold settings or fluid-affected metamorphic terranes in general, monazite can grow by metamorphic and hydrothermal processes. The objective of this research is to distinguish between these monazite growth processes to provide constraints on orogenic gold mineralization in the Klondike. Vein material, altered wall-rock, and unaltered host-rock samples were investigated at the Virgin, Mitchell-Sheba, and Lone Star gold occurrences. Detailed petrographic analyses were integrated with LA-ICP-MS Th-Pb monazite dates and ThO₂ concentrations to identify metamorphic and hydrothermal monazite. The age of metamorphic monazite in the Klondike is between 189 and 151 Ma, with possible discrete pulses at approximately 175 and 160 Ma. These ages overlap with existing ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar mica cooling ages and represent retrograde monazite growth during crustal exhumation. The age of hydrothermal monazite is between 178 to 117 Ma, with possible discrete pulses at approximately 169, 148, and 128 Ma. These ages represent episodic vein formation and provide approximate constraints on gold mineralization. The methods developed can be used to identify metamorphic and hydrothermal monazite globally to provide robust time constraints on metamorphism, vein formation, and gold mineralization. Metamorphic monazite occurs regardless of proximity to veins, is typically adjacent to or intergrown with other metamorphic minerals, and has variable ThO₂ concentrations that depend on the host-rock composition and metamorphic grade. In contrast, hydrothermal monazite occurs in or adjacent to veins, is typically adjacent to or intergrown with hydrothermal minerals, and has a distinctly low ThO₂ concentration <2.00 wt.%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→