MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981658854 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz120

Le dépistage précoce du trouble du spectre de l’autisme chez les jeunes enfants

2019· article· fr· W2981658854 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Jessica Brian, Angie Ip

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Paediatric Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGynecologyPhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le trouble du spectre de l’autisme (TSA) est un trouble neurodéveloppemental permanent qui se caractérise par des déficits de la communication sociale, un mode répétitif et restreint des comportements et des sensibilités ou des intérêts sensoriels inhabituels. Le TSA a des répercussions importantes sur la vie des enfants et de leur famille. À l’heure actuelle, sa prévalence estimative est de un cas sur 66 enfants et adolescents canadiens dans le groupe d’âge des cinq à 17 ans. Les pédiatres généraux, les médecins de famille et les autres professionnels de la santé rencontrent donc plus d’enfants ayant un TSA qu’auparavant dans leur pratique. Le diagnostic rapide de ce trouble et l’orientation des cas vers des interventions comportementales et éducationnelles intensives dès le plus jeune âge peuvent favoriser un meilleur pronostic clinique à long terme grâce à la neuroplasticité du cerveau à un plus jeune âge. Le présent docu-ment de principes contient des recommandations et des outils clairs, détaillés et fondés sur des données probantes pour aider les pédiatres communautaires et les autres dispensateurs de soins de première ligne à surveiller les tout premiers signes de TSA, ce qui constitue une étape importante vers un diagnostic précis et une évaluation détaillée des besoins pour planifier les interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→