MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981672736 · doi:10.4095/225402

Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Maps and grid values to be used with the 2005 National Building Code of Canada

2008· report· en· W2981672736 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic hazardGridCode (set theory)HazardGeographyBuilding codeHazard mapComputer scienceSeismologyCartographyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceGeologyCivil engineeringEngineeringGeodesyProgramming languageEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's 4 Generation seismic th hazard model is the basis for the seismic design provisions in the 2005 National Building Code of Canada. The 2005 code uses median ground motion on firm soil sites for a probability of exceedence of 2% in 50 years, with the ground motion being described by seismic hazard values for five parameters: spectral acceleration at 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 second periods and peak acceleration. We tabulate values of the five parameters for more than 200,000 grid points over Canadian territory and surrounding areas. The four spectral parameters will allow the construction of approximate uniform hazard spectra for every place in Canada, and hence improve earthquake-resistant design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207