MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981672736 · doi:10.4095/225402

Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Maps and grid values to be used with the 2005 National Building Code of Canada

2008· report· en· W2981672736 on OpenAlexaffabout
S Halchuk, J Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic hazardGridCode (set theory)HazardGeographyBuilding codeHazard mapComputer scienceSeismologyCartographyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceGeologyCivil engineeringEngineeringGeodesyProgramming languageEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's 4 Generation seismic th hazard model is the basis for the seismic design provisions in the 2005 National Building Code of Canada. The 2005 code uses median ground motion on firm soil sites for a probability of exceedence of 2% in 50 years, with the ground motion being described by seismic hazard values for five parameters: spectral acceleration at 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 second periods and peak acceleration. We tabulate values of the five parameters for more than 200,000 grid points over Canadian territory and surrounding areas. The four spectral parameters will allow the construction of approximate uniform hazard spectra for every place in Canada, and hence improve earthquake-resistant design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207