Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Thoracic CT Texture Analysis and Machine Learning to Predict Pulmonary Ventilation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Fixed airflow limitation and ventilation heterogeneity are common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Conventional noncontrast CT provides airway and parenchymal measurements but cannot be used to directly determine lung function. Purpose To develop, train, and test a CT texture analysis and machine-learning algorithm to predict lung ventilation heterogeneity in participants with COPD. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02723474; conducted from January 2010 to February 2017), participants were randomized to optimization (n = 1), training (n = 67), and testing (n = 27) data sets. Hyperpolarized (HP) helium 3 (3He) MRI ventilation maps were co-registered with thoracic CT to provide ground truth labels, and 87 quantitative imaging features were extracted and normalized to lung averages to generate 174 features. The volume-of-interest dimension and the training data sampling method were optimized to maximize the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Forward feature selection was performed to reduce the number of features; logistic regression, linear support vector machine, and quadratic support vector machine classifiers were trained through fivefold cross validation. The highest-performing classification model was applied to the test data set. Pearson coefficients were used to determine the relationships between the model, MRI, and pulmonary function measurements. Results The quadratic support vector machine performed best in training and was applied to the test data set. Model-predicted ventilation maps had an accuracy of 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88%, 88%) and an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.83) when the HP 3He MRI ventilation maps were used as the reference standard. Model-predicted ventilation defect percentage (VDP) was correlated with VDP at HP 3He MRI (r = 0.90, P < .001). Both model-predicted and HP 3He MRI VDP were correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (model: r = -0.65, P < .001; MRI: r = -0.70, P < .001), ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (model: r = -0.73, P < .001; MRI: r = -0.75, P < .001), diffusing capacity (model: r = -0.69, P < .001; MRI: r = -0.65, P < .001), and quality-of-life score (model: r = 0.59, P = .001; MRI: r = 0.65, P < .001). Conclusion Model-predicted ventilation maps generated by using CT textures and machine learning were correlated with MRI ventilation maps (r = 0.90, P < .001). © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Fain in this issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".