MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981712295 · doi:10.4095/222770

Compilation of soil and till geochemical metadata for Canada - an update

2006· report· en· W2981712295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataDatabaseEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceGeologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada systematic regional geochemical sampling of soils and tills have been undertaken since the 1960s (Brummer et al., 1987) primarily for mineral exploration but also for resource assessment and environmental research purposes. The majority of these surveys have been conducted by federal and provincial geological agencies and the mineral exploration industry, but some have been collected by consultancies, universities and other government departments. The Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) has developed a catalogue of geochemical metadata which is available as GSC Open File 5085 and on the Natural Resources Canada Geoscience Data Repository Web site (GDR) (http://gdr.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geochem/). The catalogue contains metadata for just over 300 surveys, 277 of which were carried out by the GSC and the provincial geological agencies. These geochemical data sets are potentially useful to scientists and regulators in other government agencies who are working on environmental issues. In the catalogue each survey is given a separate html page which lists the survey type, survey year and survey location, a description of the survey, including its geographic extent, the number of samples collected (if available), the types of geochemical analyses and size fractions analyzed, other types of analyses undertaken, publications associated with the survey and the form of the dataset (i.e. digital or paper). There is also a link on the html page to the organization responsible for collecting the data for that survey. Publications associated with the survey can be obtained from that organization. An html page, accessible from the CD-ROM's introductory window directs the user to the appropriate page on the organization's web site. Included on the CD is a 1:7 500 000 map of Canada (~77 x 62 cm) showing the areas covered by the surveys. It can be accessed from a link in Chapter VI of this report or by clicking on the Maps button on the introductory screen of the CD. The Maps button launches a browser-based mapping application which allows the user to search the catalogue geographically, by zooming in on the part of Canada that is of interest. The survey html page described above is displayed by clicking on its corresponding polygon (see Chapter I - Introduction for more details). The abbreviations used in the html pages to describe analytical procedures, etc., are explained in this chapter. This chapter also contains background information on the distribution and compositional characteristics of tills and other surficial sediments and the methodologies used for sample collection and geochemical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207