MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981717575 · doi:10.1107/s2056989019013756

Crystal structure, synthesis and thermal properties of bis(acetonitrile-κ<i>N</i>)bis(4-benzoylpyridine-κ<i>N</i>)bis(isothiocyanato-κ<i>N</i>)nickel(II)

2019· article· en· W2981717575 on OpenAlexaff
Carsten Wellm, Christian Näther

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsChemistryNitrilePyridineAcetonitrileCrystal structureThio-Hydrogen bondCrystallographyCyanateThermogravimetric analysisNickelStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryPolymer chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [Ni(NCS)2(CH3CN)2(C12H9NO)2] or Ni(NCS)2(4-benzoylpyridine)2(acetonitrile)2, the NiII ions are octahedrally coordinated by the N atoms of two thiocyanate anions, two 4-benzoylpyridine ligands and two acetonitrile molecules into discrete complexes that are located on centres of inversion. In the crystal, the discrete complexes are linked by centrosymmetric pairs of weak C—H...S hydrogen bonds into chains. Thermogravimetric measurements prove that, upon heating, the title complex loses the two acetonitrile ligands and transforms into a new crystalline modification of the chain compound [Ni(NCS)2(4-benzoylpyridine)2], which is different from that of the corresponding CoII, NiII and CdII coordination polymers reported in the literature. IR spectroscopic investigations indicate the presence of bridging thiocyanate anions but the powder pattern cannot be indexed and, therefore, this structure is unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207