Indicator mineral abundance data for a bedrock sample from the Little River antimony occurrence, Newfoundland and Labrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of the Geological Survey of Canada's Targeted Geoscience Initiative 4 (TGI-4) Program, one bedrock sample was collected from the Little River antimony occurrence in southern Newfoundland to determine the indicator minerals that are indicative of Sb deposits. The purpose of this open file is to report the raw indicator mineral weight and abundance data for the bedrock sample collected in 2012 for this case study. The sample was processed using a combination of tabling, panning, and heavy liquids to recover potential indicator minerals. Sample location, weights of various fractions produced during sample processing, and indicator mineral grains identified are reported in this open file. Two Sb minerals were recovered from the bedrock sample, stibnite and stibiconite, as well as gold, arsenopyrite, and pyrite. This study provides preliminary insights into the physical appearance, size, and abundance of Sb-rich minerals which will help in the future identification of Sb-rich indicator minerals in unconsolidated surficial sediments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".