MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981749891 · doi:10.1149/2.1061914jes

Ion Association Constants for Lithium Ion Battery Electrolytes from First-Principles Quantum Chemistry

2019· article· en· W2981749891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonChemistryElectrolyteLithium (medication)Ion-associationSolventQuantum chemistryQuantum chemicalBattery (electricity)Inorganic chemistryLithium-ion batteryPhysical chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Computational chemistryMoleculeElectrochemistryThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryPhysicsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a quantum chemical computational framework to calculate ion association constants relevant to lithium ion battery electrolytes. We compare our method to reported experimental values as the solvent, cation, and anion are varied. For solvent, anion, and cation variations, the standard errors are respectively 0.2 eV, 0.12 eV, and 0.11 eV for the chosen data set, where Pearson correlation values are all above 0.92.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it