MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence and Risk Factors for IVIG-Mediated Hemolysis

2017· article· en· W2981751437 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacob Pendergrast, Beth Binnington, Tik Nga Tong, Jeannie Callum, Christine Cserti‐Gazdewich, Wendy Lau, Lani Lieberman, Yulia Lin, Katerina Pavenski, Nadine Shehata, Rae S. M. Yeung, Donald R. Branch

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalHealth Sciences CentreCanadian Blood Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemolysisMedicineReticulocytosisIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineHemoglobinGastroenterologyAnemiaABO blood group systemRelative riskConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION Hemolysis is a recognized complication of high-dose IVIG infusion, but as the majority of case reports are retrospective the actual incidence and risk factors for its occurrence are poorly understood. METHODS: Between November 2012 and October 2016, recipients of high-dose IVIG in Toronto (Canada) were prospectively monitored for hemolysis using a panel of investigations performed pre- and post-infusion and then 5-10 days later. Hemolysis was defined and graded as per the Canadian IVIG Hemolysis Pharmacovigilance Group, with both patient and product risk factors analyzed for correlation. RESULTS: After a preliminary analysis revealed a strong association with ABO group and dose, enrollment was restricted to patients with non-O blood group receiving doses ≥ 2 g/kg, adjusted for lean body mass. Within this cohort, 99 infusions to 78 patients completed the follow-up protocol, with hemolysis observed in 32 (32%) and 28 (36%) of cases, respectively. Hemolytic anemia of Grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 were observed in 10, 9, 2 and 7 patients, respectively, and an additional 4 patients hemolyzed but maintained a stable hemoglobin via reticulocytosis. Although the initial fall in hemoglobin was slightly larger in hemolytic than non-hemolytic reactions (-14.9 vs -11.1 g/L, p = 0.0091), in 84% of cases laboratory confirmation of hemolysis only manifested 5-10 days after the infusion. In contrast, while 88% of hemolyzers had a positive DAT immediately post-IVIG, this proportion had fallen to 38% by day 5-10. Amongst 49 infusions evaluated by day 5-10 monocyte monolayer assay, there was 69% correlation between the development of hemolysis and the presence of heightened phagocytic activity in patient monocytes, vs 43% correlation when testing was performed with monocytes from healthy controls. Further supporting a state of increased macrophage activation, the proportional increase in serum ferritin was greater in hemolyzers than non-hemolyzers (5.1-fold vs 2.1-fold, p = 0.033). Conversely, all positive DAT test results were for IgG only, with no evidence of complement deposition. In regards to predictors of hemolysis, univariate analysis identified a higher incidence with group AB than with other blood groups (90% vs 26%, p = 0.0001), in first-time compared to repeat recipients (50% vs 20%, p = 0.002), in patients not taking immunosuppressant medications (43% vs 23%, p = 0.0316), and in patients whose post-infusion DAT was 1+ or stronger as compared to weak or by eluate only (57% vs 19%, p = 0.0001). One of three manufacturers had a lower rate of hemolysis (0% vs 35%, p = 0.009) but was also more likely than the other two manufacturers to be given to patients on immunosuppressant medications (83% vs 24%, p=0.0001). No correlation was observed with year of treatment, patient age, sex, BMI, diagnosis, rate of infusion, steroid pre-medication, subjective symptoms or pre-infusion levels of CRP or IL1-RA. CONCLUSION: Amongst non-O blood group recipients of high-dose IVIG, hemolysis is common and appears to occur via delayed-onset phagocytosis by activated patient monocytes. The highest risk appears to be in patients with blood group AB, those who are receiving IVIG for the first time, who are not taking immunosuppressive medications, or who have a 1+ or stronger DAT immediately post-infusion. Whether specific IVIG products carry higher risk requires further study. Disclosures Lin: Pfizer: Other: advisory board; Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring, Grifols: Other: unrestricted education grant; Novartis: Research Funding. Pavenski: Novartis: Honoraria; Ablynx: Other: participation in industry sponsored RCT; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Branch: CSL Behring (Bern): Research Funding; CSL Behring (Canada): Research Funding; Canadian Blood Services: Employment, Research Funding; ViroCarb Inc.: Other: Founder and stock holder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207